Jul 23, 2012

Colorado Shooting

Monday, July 23, 2012
0

While in the Dubai airport on my way back to China a few days ago, I happened to look at one of the TV monitors in the waiting area and saw the news about the Colorado movie theater massacre that took place that day. Like most people, I felt shock and sadness about the tragedy, but I also felt a bit embarrassed because news like this seems to happen rather frequently in America. Whether American, Chinese or any other nationality, I imagine that the vast majority of people worldwide sympathize with the victims and struggle to understand what could possibly motivate someone to randomly gun down people for no apparent reason.


In China, in addition to shock and sympathy, there's also another reaction - a confirmation of the belief that America is a violent and dangerous country. Sadly (at least to me), this view is largely correct. Comparatively, China has is much safer than America (at least in terms of violent crime). 


I often talk with Chinese college students trying to get an idea of what their perceptions of Americans are and while there are also many positive views, one of the most common responses is that Americans all have guns. In discussion sessions about American culture, the most common question I hear is "why do Americans all have guns?" I try to answer logically by first explaining that the notion that all Americans have guns is an exaggeration. Then, I try to explain some of the justifications offered for gun ownership in America (self defense, sport, hunting). Having grown up watching American films and TV shows (many of which feature guns being used by people to kill others), they seem to have a hard time accepting my explanations (I guess I can't blame them). 


To Chinese people, there's a very simple way to prevent tragedies such as that which occurred in Colorado and they can't understand why we let these things continue to happen in America. When they ask why the government doesn't stop people from owning guns, I try to explain that owning guns also involves a very important American ideal of individual freedom. While no one has ever put it this bluntly to me, my guess is that they view the notion that freedom includes the right to own guns as ridiculous.


While I certainly value freedom, I have to admit that I'd voluntarily sacrifice some of my freedom to reduce the amount of pointless slaughter that occurs when idiots and lunatics like James Holmes have easy access to guns. Without debating the Constitutional issue of the right to bear arms (although I wish people would actually read the whole second amendment to the Constitution which grants this right for the purpose of forming a militia to provide security), I think we have gone beyond the realm of sanity in America at least in terms of allowing people such easy access to guns and especially automatic weapons. Today, I came across a Twitter post by Jason Alexander (best known for his role in the TV show Seinfeld). Its kind of sad when George Costanza is the voice of reason for America, especially knowing that this voice will continue to be mostly ignored.

Jul 19, 2012

Xiamen Boardwalk Photos

Thursday, July 19, 2012
0

A few months ago I took some photos one evening while walking along the boardwalk in Xiamen (厦门).

A shot taken from Xiamen looking toward Gulangyu Island
Gulangyu Island has an interesting history. In 1842, after the First Opium War (in which the then mighty British empire fought for its right to smuggle opium into China), China was forced to open  several ports to foreign trade, one of which was Xiamen. The small island of Gulangyu (which is very close to the coast of Xiamen) then became the home of many of the early European businessmen and their families. Gulangyu still boast some old European style buildings and is now one of Xiamen's main tourist attractions. Here's a few more shots of the boardwalk in a slideshow:

View all          Get your own

Jul 17, 2012

Crouching Actress, Hidden Scandal?

Tuesday, July 17, 2012
0

Chinese, like most people, love rumors and scandals, especially when they involve world famous celebrities and government leaders. So a recent rumor that famous actress Zhang Ziyi (Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, Hero, Rush Hour 2, etc.) has been prostituting herself for $1.5 million per transaction with Bo Xilai (former politician currently under arrest) has created quite a stir in the not-so-traditional Chinese media (i.e., the Chinese blogosphere).


An animated video humorously depicting the story


Bo Xilai is a former Chinese Communist party (CCP) leader who was recently removed from power and detained (arrested?) in connection with various corruption allegations (as well as his wife's suspected connection to the murder of a British businessman). The rumor has it that Zhang Ziyi was introduced to Bo by a friend of Bo's (who she also allegedly also slept with, but  for a mere $1 million in this case). 


Zhang has vehemently denied the allegations and in all likelihood, the story is merely rumor since there's apparently no proof. There is also good reason to be suspicious of this rumor since Zhang, although the most internationally known Chinese actress, has proven to be less popular in China and has been the subject of quite a few slanderous rumors. There's also no shortage of Chinese people fed up with corruption by government officials and Bo Xilai therefore makes a very attractive target to vent on (especially since the CCP has arrested him).


While Zhang certainly looks good in this photo, $1.5 million seems a bit pricey to me, but of course I'm in a much different income-level than Bo Xilai and I guess some men are willing to pay just about anything for beauty, fame and their own ego.

Jul 15, 2012

Scenic Yangshuo

Sunday, July 15, 2012
0

Several years ago, I visited the town of Yangshuo which is part of Guilin, located in Guanxi Province of southern China. Yangshuo is famous for its scenery, especially the karst peaks. Many visitors to Yangshuo come from Guilin by boat along the scenic Li River which is a great way to travel and enjoy the Chinese countryside.

Like many scenic areas in China, Yangshuo has become a popular tourist attraction and has sadly become overly commercialized. The main streets are packed with shops and vendors selling highly overpriced items of all sorts to naive tourists. Even those smart enough to bargain for prices are still likely to get gouged (I tried to buy a few souvenir gifts, but gave up after about 20 minutes of bargaining to little avail since the vendor's starting price was ridiculously high). 

In addition to the countryside scenery (and ripoff shopping experience if you're into that), another fun thing to do is attend an outdoor performance called Impression Liu Sanjie which was co-produced by famous Chinese film director Zhang Yimou. The performance is an incredible experience, with the audience seated in front of a river and mountain. Most of the show is acted out by about 600 singers and dancers on the water with the mountain providing the background. 
Here's YouTube clip of part of the Liu Sanjie show
Yangshuo isn't one of the best known places in China and its quite a distance for most foreign visitors who stick to Beijing, Shanghai and other more northern oriented cities, but its certainly worth a short visit if you're in Guilin (which makes a nice sidetrip from Hong Kong or Shenzhen).

Jul 13, 2012

New Terracotta Soldiers Unearthed

Friday, July 13, 2012
0

The city of Xi'an (西安) in Central China has become one of the China's top tourist attractions over the past few decades and largely as a result of tourism has become a thriving, modern city. Things probably would have turned out much different for Xi'an if it wasn't for the accidental discovery of the now famous terracotta warriors (individually unique, life-size clay sculptures of ancient soldiers).

View all  These aren't the most recently discovered Terracotta dudes, but photos I took a few years ago



The first terracotta warriors were discovered in 1974 by local farmers digging a well near the city of Xi'an. Since then, thousands of soldiers have been excavated and are now on exhibit at the Museum of the Terracotta Warriors and Horses of Qin Shihuang.


Recently, an additional 110 terracotta soldiers have been dug up after spending over 2000 years underground guarding their emperor who is supposed to lie nearby in his yet unearthed tomb. Qin Shihuang, who had this mind-boggling tribute to himself built (to guard him in the afterlife), unified the then-warring Chinese states in 221 B.C. and became the first emperor of what we in the West call China.


In addition to the soldiers, there are also terracotta horses and chariots as well as acrobats and musicians (to provide entertainment since they didn't have Internet and iTunes back then).  According to China's official historian, Sima Qian, construction of the emperor's mausoleum began in 246 BC just after Qin became emperor and ultimately involved the work of 700,000 laborers (many of which were forced laborers such as prisoners and slaves). 


Ironically, the Terracotta warriors may become best known in the West thanks to the corny 2008 movie The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor. In the film, the very old and long-dead emperor and his terracotta army are brought back to life an end up fighting an "army of the dead" which is supposed to be all the workers who died building the Great Wall for Emperor Qin (in reality, most of the Great Wall as we know it today was actually built many centuries later during the Ming Dynasty but Hollywood and many accounts of Chinese history prefer to ignore historical accuracy). Maybe the newly discovered warriors merit a new movie although I guess that depends much more on box office receipts of the original.
Giddy-up, I'm ready for that sequel!

Jul 10, 2012

Confucian Constitution Confusion

Tuesday, July 10, 2012
1

A July 10 Op-Ed article in the New York Times, A Confucian Constitution for China, recently caught my attention. The first paragraph of the article challenges the notion that China must, according to the views of many Westerners, become more democratic and that "framing the debate in terms of democracy versus authoritarianism overlooks better possibilities." Reading this far, I could certainly agree with the notion that there might be other possibilities and was intrigued what the authors might propose.


The second paragraph, however, quickly changed my opinion and caused me to wonder what ivory tower the authors have been locked up in. This paragraph claims that "[t]he political future of China is far likelier to be determined by the longstanding Confucian tradition of 'humane authority' than by Western-style multiparty elections." Again, I agree that a Western democratic ideal of multiparty elections isn't at all likely in China's foreseeable future, but the notion that an far more ancient ideal of Confucian humane authority is going to determine China's political future seems equally unlikely.


While I don't claim to be an expert on Confucianism (儒家; rujia), I have done a lot of reading about it and have at least a basic understanding of what its about. For a short and oversimplified explanation, its essentially a system of social behavior (for ruler as well as the ruled) based on moral principles derived from the teachings of Confucius (孔子; Kongzi), a teacher and philosopher in ancient China. Having lived in China for a few years, I've been able to get a bit of a feel for how Confucianism impacts modern Chinese society. There's a lot to be said for certain aspects of Confucianism as a moral ideology and it still plays a very important role in Chinese culture and society. However, I think its use as a political tool in modern China has been more in terms of image rather than substance its impact therefore somewhat overrated.

I also don't claim to be able to determine or predict how China's political system may change, but rather than any type of dramatic change (whether Western democracy or Confucian humanity), I think China will continue to do what its been doing for the past 30 odd years - evolve gradually, according to circumstances, experimenting a bit with various ideas (even including some democratic notions - e.g., China already has some voting for low level government administration), trying to evaluate what's working and what isn't, and adapting along the way (somewhat limited by differences in political ideology within the Chinese Communist Party, which despite being a single party has conservative and liberal factions). 

Although this is a very broad generalization, in my opinion, Chinese leaders since the late 1970s (post Chairman Mao and beginning with Deng Xiaoping) have tended to be largely pragmatic. Their main concerns (aside from maintaining their own political power) seem to be continuing China's rapid economic development (which seems to be slowing a bit after about 30 years of about 10% annual growth), maintaining political and social stability (what Hu Jintao often refers to as a "harmonious society"; 和谐社会; hexie shehui).

While it would be inaccurate to say that moral ideology plays no part in Chinese governance, I think its more accurate to say that to whatever extent moral ideology does play a role, that role is clearly outweighed by pragmatism as well as staunch determination to retain the PRC government's power. Throughout China's long history, many leaders have portrayed themselves as the image of Confucian virtue and benevolence while often ignoring the substance of Confucian ideals of humane authority for their own benefit and/or for what they perceived as more practical considerations. 

Perhaps the Times article's authors are expressing what they ideally envision as China's political evolution which admittedly could be positive in many respects (who can argue with the idea of governance based on virtue and benevolence?). However, I suspect that this belief may be just as unrealistic as the notion (criticized by the article) that China will become a Western-style democracy. For what its worth, my prediction (or, more accurately, guess) is that China's political evolution will continue to be gradual and experimental, incorporating elements of various ideologies (democratic, socialist, etc.) as well as practical considerations. This may not be so bad since neither democracy or socialism seems to have worked without serious flaws in recent history.

Jul 5, 2012

World's Biggest Dam Complete

Thursday, July 05, 2012
0

As reported by The Guardian, after 18 years of work and the controversial displacement of 1.3 million people, China's Three Gorges Dam has finally been completed at its full capacity. This enormous (and enormously expensive) project will produce an enormous amount of power which is desperately needed in China. Despite the positive aspects of the project such as relatively clean energy, there have been negative impacts as well as illustrated by the following graphic.




Here's short video about the dam's completion